Friday, May 10, 2019

English 102 Literature Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

English 102 Literature - Essay ExampleThe chapter opens with donkeyworks rhetorical question of where should the line of control be drawn between the authority of confederation and individual sovereignty. Mill provides the answer to this question in the very next sentence look that what concerns the individuals should belong to them and society has a control on that interrupt which chiefly interests it. Here, Mill does not, however, elaborate on what could be those aras of societys interest. After ruling out the possibility of the society being based on a contract, the author still thinks that the individuals owe the other members of the society a return for the benefit of the protection that the society provides. The individuals cannot be allowed to harm other peoples interests. Rather they should play their portion in protecting them against injury. If individuals act in a way that mars other peoples welfare, even if they are not illegal, they may be punished by notion. Here , public opinion is suggested to be a alternate for law when necessary. Mill writes, These conditions society is justified in enforcing at all costs to those who endeavor to deny fulfillment. When a persons conduct affects only his interests, however, Mill says, that person should be allowed to do the action and arise the consequences. There is no justification for societys meddling.After setting After setting the boundary line for the society, Mill goes on to clear his standpoint by saying, It would be a great misunderstanding of this doctrine to count on that it is one of selfish indifference, which pretends that human beings have no business with distributively others conduct in life, and that they should not concern themselves about the well-doing or well-being of one another he declares that It is equally the business of raising to cultivate in the students the feelings of compassion for the fellow human beings and the sense of responsibility to the society. Individuals a re indebted to each other. They should help and encourage each other in bringing about the best of themselves. But no individual should dictate terms to another simply be manage He is the person most interested in his own well-being and also because he better understands his circumstances that make him behave in a certain way than some(prenominal)one else or the society in general. Others can offer their advice and suggestions but cannot take any decision on behalf of the person. If the individual allows others to take his decisions, then that might cause greater harm than if he takes a decision against the popular belief.Next, Mill talks about the freedom of opinion. Suppression of public opinion by the government can only lead to concealment of truth. By this Mill does not rigorous that public opinion is never ruin or biased, but at least the opinions that are wrong can be challenged to arrive at the truth. Here, Mill uses an interesting adjective that is, self-regarding which means concerning solely the individual, and advocates that in these self-regarding matters the government or the society has no right to interfere. However, sensing attack against this viewpoint, Mill immediately clarifies saying that this should not stop a well wisher of an individual from warning him against the harm he might cause himself by behaving in certain way even if it is about the self-regarding affairs. Similarly, every individual has the right to and job of cautioning any individual against the possible

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.